There’s often a moment, when someone stands in front of an abstract painting and looks slightly uncomfortable. Not because they dislike it, but because they’re not sure what they’re supposed to do with it.

This is entirely understandable…

Abstract art doesn’t give you a clear place to stand. There can be no obvious subject, no fixed meaning, nothing to confirm whether you’re “getting it”, and that uncertainty can feel like a barrier.

But that’s exactly the point.

I don’t make paintings to illustrate an idea and I’m not trying to translate something neatly from my head onto a canvas or panel. If anything, I’m trying to stay just slightly out-of-control in the process —working in that space where something can emerge that I didn’t fully intend. That might sound a bit vague, but it’s actually a real physical thing.

I’ll build up layers, then disrupt them; I’ll make some marks, then bury them; I’ll add collage elements only for them to be partially buried again under paint or oil stick. There’s a constant negotiation between holding on and letting go —a perpetual push and pull.

Themes that run through my work include questions around belief, doubt, inheritance, memory and curiosity. These are things that can’t easily be resolved, so the works don’t answer those questions, they hold them.

So when someone asks what a painting “means”, I don’t feel the need to necessarily pin it down tightly. The meaning isn’t fixed but instead shifts depending on who’s looking, and when.

What I would say is, abstract art isn’t always something you decode, it’s something you spend time with and foster very individual responses to.

If it stays with you, unsettles you slightly, or draws you back in for more—that’s probably enough.